Disclaimer:
We encourage posts that are made in a respectful manner. We do, however, reserve the right to delete any submissions that contain:
- Vulgar language, including graphic, obscene, explicit, racist or sexist comments
- Personal attacks of any kind
- Abusive, hateful or slanderous comments to any person, ethnicity, religion, organization or nation
- Spam
- Comments clearly off topic
- Comments that suggest, endorse or encourage illegal activity
- Promotion, solicitation or advertisement of particular services, products or political organizations
- Infringement of copyrights or trademarks
- Personally identifiable or sensitive information, including medical information

Oct 20 showed an ordinance that cannot find its problem: 19 steady-tonal complaints tested, zero founded, 18 failing the current definition, while staff readings in the 50s at night and low 60s by day sit far below the 73/68 dB(C) limits. On Nov 17 give direction specific enough to advertise: revisit the definition and thresholds, address cumulative sound and prompt, condition-matched testing, and start from the DCOAG/consultant draft. Full comment emailed to the Board. - Daniel Zadory, Bristow